Doesn't this mean we shouldn't have any laws, because one day the laws could be used to imprison everyone and use their internal organs to produce email spam?
The point is, I think we still have travel alternatives and legal protections from abuse.
The federal government only has the authority to affect travel between states, not within a single state. If the TSA starts interfering with movement in a single state (like on the NYC subway system), we'll see pushback from the state and local governments.
> If the TSA starts interfering with movement in a single state
You mean, if the TSA starts screening (and, thus, assuming the power to reject) passengers for intrastate air travel, like they have been since day one of TSA operations?
If the TSA starts interfering with movement in a single state (like on the NYC subway system), we'll see pushback from the state and local governments.
Nope, in fact NYC welcomed the Terrorists' Surrogate Army invasion of the subway.
Logic like this means you essentially hide from the problem until there's nowhere left. What happens then?