Is that the wiki page that computer language designers link to when compiler developers complain that they have no clue how a pet feature would actually be implemented?
As it stands what you've done is attacked the logic of the argument, as opposed to giving so much as a weak suggestion of how the problem would actually be solved.
As it stands what you've done is attacked the logic of the argument, as opposed to giving so much as a weak suggestion of how the problem would actually be solved.