"Ownership doesn't intrinsically preclude you harming others."
How can I have property rights (ownership) if you can simply damage my property through your "property rights"? Property rights can not exist in this case.
It is intrinsically implied that people can not use their property to damage the property of others.
How can I have property rights (ownership) if you can simply damage my property through your "property rights"? Property rights can not exist in this case.
It is intrinsically implied that people can not use their property to damage the property of others.