Your Solr cluster kicked the bucket at 150QPS? Jesus dude. I couldn't reproduce ... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		codewright on Nov 15, 2012 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Features of Solr vs. ElasticSearch Your Solr cluster kicked the bucket at 150QPS? Jesus dude. I couldn't reproduce that with my single or multi-node ElasticSearch clusters if I wanted to. How were the EBS backing stores setup for these EC2 nodes? Edit: Also, when I was talking about "them" falling apart, I meant Postgres or Sphinx, not Solr/ElasticSearch. Well-configured Solr and ElasticSearch clusters can work very well for most people.

fizx on Nov 15, 2012 [–]

EBS shouldn't really matter, because with a reasonable heap, he should have 40-50G of available filesystem cache, and 48G of data.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact