Or you're writing for the people who haven't deluded themselves into thinking that they're magical LLM detectors, which definitely does seem like a win.
> Or you're writing for the people who haven't deluded themselves into thinking that they're magical LLM detectors, which definitely does seem like a win.
What delusion? The false positive rate just on HN alone is so low it's not even a rounding error.
No, you are writing for people who see LLM-signals and read on anyway.
Not sure that that's a win for you.