Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You probably should revisit your opinion about what wars would look like today.

- WW1 was a competition of troops: how many soldiers each country was willing to sacrifice for victory. Something like 50M soldiers participated.

- WW2 was a competition of hardware, less troops - how much industrial output could each country pour into the battle. Aprox. 300 000 tanks, 200 000 airplanes , 9000 warships (according to chatgpt), 2750 Liberty cargo ships (wikipedia).

- WW3 can't be a competition of troops (where would they get 50 million people, how would they train them, how would they feed them?), and it can't be a competition of hardware (who could make 300 000 tanks, 200 000 airplanes and 9 000 ships today?, where would they even get that much steel?).

World war today could be 1) nuclear and we're doomed, or 2) kids playing with toy drones breaking windows at each other's factories - you're mostly safe, unless you work there.





> World war today could be 1) nuclear and we're doomed, or 2) kids playing with toy drones breaking windows at each other's factories - you're mostly safe, unless you work there.

Cyber war, especially insufficiently defended industrial equipment control systems.

And about those drones: the category scales up and down, all the way from toys to things that rip apart apartment blocks.

And about quantity, Ukraine is estimated to be at the scale of millions of units last year, expended like munitions rather than like vehicles.


The drones that rip apart apartment block would be as rare and expensive as a tank. We won't see many of those. We're in the era of cheap.

I am afraid that in a total war, all available resources will be used.

My point is that there aren't that many resources available to make a war big enough to worry about. Unless nuclear, like I said.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: