Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Except you’re not the one doing the creating. It would be like me hiring an artist to execute my vision and then calling myself artistic. Empowering, maybe, but it’s closer to the illusion of power. You control a genie, but you don’t have the power yourself. And it’s worse than that, because in reality the genie is controlled by some mega corp, and not by you at all, and suddenly you need this genie to do all your thinking for you because you’ve forgotten how.


I don't care to call myself an artist. Nor is it about "being an artist" - subjective anyways and _could_ be defined as the ability to bring to life the things you think; of which AI is a tool.


> It would be like me hiring an artist to execute my vision and then calling myself artistic.

Not disagreeing with you, but you might want to sit down for this...

https://www.ft.com/content/d84c8502-d413-4a26-a59c-494af1197...

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45416670


Frauds have existed before AI, sure. There are people who get others to write their books for them too.


You mean like a movie/tv/music Producer?


At least those people are aware of where they sit and who they depend on, and they're not hiding it. A movie producer doesn't pretend to have created the movie by himself, someone who uses AI to write their blog posts on the other hand...

It's too tempting for people to have AI do all the creative work and then take credit for it, and it gives these people the delusion of thinking they're literally artists, authors, bloggers, etc.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: