Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Are deaths per megawatt really better if one looks at total infrastructure deaths from transmission wires and the like?


I think the answer is that they are, because there aren't that many infrastructure deaths.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK448087/ says that in the US, where the statistics are best, "electrical injuries cause approximately 1000 deaths annually. Of these, around 400 result from high-voltage electrical injuries, while lightning accounts for 50 to 300 deaths." That's 400 deaths per year from high-voltage transmission lines and substations, and from other high-voltage sources such as CRT televisions being repaired or ion-implantation voltage sources. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electricity_sector_of_the_Unit... says the USA's utility-scale electricity generation was 4230.723 TWh in 02022.

So that's ballpark 100 nanodeaths per megawatt hour from transmission wires and the like. Or 0.1 deaths per terawatt hour. By contrast, https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2008/03/deaths-per-twh-for-all... claims that rooftop solar claimed 0.44 deaths per terawatt hour at the time; possibly that has improved since then, but I doubt that it has changed that much. Brian Wang returned to the question in 02021 in https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2021/07/2020-fatalities-for-us... and estimated almost 1 death per terawatt hour.

So it seems clear that the infrastructural deaths are much lower than the deaths from falling off roofs.


Secondary question, is rooftop solar installation any different in danger than housing construction or other equivalent blue collar construction jobs that people will fill anyway?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: