Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I have Tahoe and it’s just as good at being a desktop os as any of the previous os’s. Not sure what you’re referring to.


There have been lots of complaints all over the place that contradict your experience.

One article that talks about it: https://osxdaily.com/2025/09/19/why-im-holding-off-on-upgrad...

For less discerning users maybe the rough edges aren't that noticeable. But the point of choosing Apple products is you should be a discerning consumer.


That article mentions basically that they’ve heard that some apps crash a bit but it’s anecdotal and not uncommon with beta/new upgrades before a patch or two (not uncommon), and that he personally dislikes or has trouble with some of the transparency or other design changes.

Neither of those things worry me personally, and I think the previous user calling it a “crappification” is still somewhat of an overreaction. Obviously from an accessibility standpoint transparency/legibility is important but as far as I’m aware tweaks are being made and these things can also be turned off or modified in accessibility settings.


This a pretty insulting comment. I’m sure ther is better word then discerning.


I was actually trying to be more neutral :\ than saying something like for consumers with taste

the point i'm trying to make is that "apple consumers" are more critical.


I understand. I have been using a Mac since 1984 and I actually like glass more than the flat aesthetic we have been through. I see it as closer to Aqua and a subtler skeuomorphic effort. I have reported to Apple some of the problems liquid glass has. I see Liquid glass as better than what we had before.


Also me having a different experience from you doesn’t make me any less critical or discerning or makes me have less taste.

There’s no good way to phrase a thought that is fundamentally flawed.


Thank you




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: