Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The high speed rail comparison is a good example of how this view is as flawed as the idea that China makes cheap crap. China spent around a trillion dollars worth of conjured financial assets on their high speed rail network. The result has some very positive qualities but also ongoing cost overruns, many incidents including quite a few deaths, and spotty service on routes that turned out to have inconsistent demand. Now the bills are coming due, revenues are way down, the country is in a large downturn, and the future is cloudy. We will see how things play out, but the idea that China has a great rail network only really stands if you ignore all the issues with debt, maintenance, and disappointing utilization.


Does public transport, which acts to serve the public, NEED to generate revenue? Of course its good if they do, but don't see it as a prerequisite.

Idk about you, but I would rather have an excess of underutilised rail then the 0km of high speed rail that is in my country.


If china went with cars like the US did instead of rail they’d have 10s of thousands of excess deaths a year.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: