Her view is that many people do use porn as a model for their sex life, and that mainstream hardcore porn - which she things has a limited world-view - should not be the de-facto source of sex education.
All that is in her TED presentation. Perhaps watching that video would give you a different sense of the person than that NYT article about the person?
I think you are right to argue that she's advocating for more of the variant of reality pornography which is a higher quality of amateur pornography, or for more erotica. However, I think her real goal is that pornography is not where people should be learning about sex, and she's using this as a way to advocate that goal.
Framed your way, she thinks porn's impact on cultural practice is too constricting, and detrimental to the type of society she wants there to be.
All that is in her TED presentation. Perhaps watching that video would give you a different sense of the person than that NYT article about the person?
I think you are right to argue that she's advocating for more of the variant of reality pornography which is a higher quality of amateur pornography, or for more erotica. However, I think her real goal is that pornography is not where people should be learning about sex, and she's using this as a way to advocate that goal.
Framed your way, she thinks porn's impact on cultural practice is too constricting, and detrimental to the type of society she wants there to be.