So basically she's making an amateur porn site, charging bucks for it, and dressing it up as moral supremacism?
I think fantasti.cc has been doing a great job at this for more than a year now (when they started featuring user-submitted porn on the frontpage and became more of a social network for sexy vids) ... except it's free and without the moral baggage.
However I do agree with her that most mainstream porn of the freely found online for free variety has become completely ridiculous.
That said, I might be willing to pay $5 to watch amateur porn that's longer than 3min bits and pieces and recorded at more than one pixel per frame.
I just visited fantasti.cc and was greeted with an ad showing some girl streching her ass, the copy claiming something about the most extreme whatever. I can’t comment on the vids on the site, but this ad shows precisely what’s wrong with most of the modern porn (and disqualifies the site for me). If Gallop makes a decent site showing people having more real sex, then I think she does more than “just build another amateur porn site”.
And I don’t think it’s appropriate to protest against “moral baggage”. She’s just offering an alternative, a different point of view, not pushing for new legislation against the forms of intercourse she doesn’t like.
I think fantasti.cc has been doing a great job at this for more than a year now (when they started featuring user-submitted porn on the frontpage and became more of a social network for sexy vids) ... except it's free and without the moral baggage.
However I do agree with her that most mainstream porn of the freely found online for free variety has become completely ridiculous.
That said, I might be willing to pay $5 to watch amateur porn that's longer than 3min bits and pieces and recorded at more than one pixel per frame.