The only way to definitely hold everybody accountable for all crimes is a police state.
Like Franklin said, he'd rather 100 guilty people go free rather than a single innocent person jailed. He was definitely willing to not hold some people accountable for their crimes because that was a requirement for a free state.
You said earlier that the solution was to change the laws, and this is what we're saying right now. Change the laws so that VPNs are allowed and cryptography is allowed so that we can avoid the police state.
>Like Franklin said, he'd rather 100 guilty people go free rather than a single innocent person jailed.
What does this have to do with anything? All jails now have innocent people in them due to process failures. How does quoting Franklin make them feel better?
>He was definitely willing to not hold some people accountable for their crimes because that was a requirement for a free state.
If by "free sate" you mean a high crime rate state where toothpaste needs to be locked up in CVS due to criminals being let free, then yeah.
Like Franklin said, he'd rather 100 guilty people go free rather than a single innocent person jailed. He was definitely willing to not hold some people accountable for their crimes because that was a requirement for a free state.
You said earlier that the solution was to change the laws, and this is what we're saying right now. Change the laws so that VPNs are allowed and cryptography is allowed so that we can avoid the police state.