Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Yeah, 100mil is really not that much. I worked on a 10B rows table on an rds r6g.4xl, and Postgres handled it fine, even with 20+ indexes. Really not ideal and I'd rather have fewer indexes and sharding the table, but postgres dealt with it.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: