Yeah, I'm not even reading your latest list of grievances and pedantic nit-picking. If you don't think people should be relaxed when taking a BP reading, I only have two words for you "Google it."
You managed to spout enough crap about the history of Javascript that it summoned Brendan Eich himself, and you even then continued to double down. It really seems like you might get some benefit by taking a deep breath and not letting every correction or even just piece of added information enrage you. That may also likely help your blood pressure.
No grievance. We've never interacted before (nice edit, btw). Yes, the outsized defensiveness did prompt to see what I was dealing with.
After rereading my initial reply I am still puzzled as to why pointing out that ambulatory measurements matter got you bent out of shape. I can concede that "Idealizing conditions also gives a misleading reading." could probably be better worded as "gives a misleading picture", but I don't think that warranted such defensiveness and hostility, you seem to have ignored the overall point made in that comment.
Yes you are, since you are the one that brought up an anecdote about an emergency visit, and I am explaining why that is not relevant.
> probably the word "wrong"
I wasn’t offended, those were your words, that I took at face value. People actually can’t read your mind, apparently you think you can read mine.
> I think people will get 90% of the way to lowest BP reading
And I’m explaining to you why just getting the “lowest” BP reading is not the overarching goal in evaluating chronic blood pressure.
> I think you probably assumed every word…
I wasn’t the only one that criticized your wording, perhaps that should be a sign to you rather than a prompt to assess my psyche.
> Anyone can look that up and find out I'm right.
On that note, is there anything specific I have said that is inaccurate? Look it up if you wish. If not, what is the purpose of your bickering?