I read it. It's a *bad* explanation. The only bit about it that feels at all tru... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		lolinder on Sept 12, 2024 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Learning to Reason with LLMs I read it. It's a bad explanation. The only bit about it that feels at all truthful is this bit, which is glossed over but likely the only real factor in the decision: > after weighing multiple factors including ... competitive advantage ... we have decided not to show the raw chains of thought to users.

infogulch on Sept 13, 2024 | [–]

Good catch. That indicates that chains of thought are a straightforward approach to make LLMs better at reasoning if you could copy it just by seeing the steps.

HeatrayEnjoyer on Sept 16, 2024 | [–]

Bad, in your opinion.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact