So, it’s good at hard-logic reasoning (which is great, and no small feat.)
Does this reasoning capability generalize outside of the knowledge domains the model was trained to reason about, into “softer” domains?
For example, is O1 better at comedy (because it can reason better about what’s funny)?
Is it better at poetry, because it can reason about rhyme and meter?
Is it better at storytelling as an extension of an existing input story, because it now will first analyze the story-so-far and deduce aspects of the characters, setting, and themes that the author seems to be going for (and will ask for more information about those things if it’s not sure)?
Does this reasoning capability generalize outside of the knowledge domains the model was trained to reason about, into “softer” domains?
For example, is O1 better at comedy (because it can reason better about what’s funny)?
Is it better at poetry, because it can reason about rhyme and meter?
Is it better at storytelling as an extension of an existing input story, because it now will first analyze the story-so-far and deduce aspects of the characters, setting, and themes that the author seems to be going for (and will ask for more information about those things if it’s not sure)?