Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It's not AGI - it's tree of thoughts, driven by some RL-derived heuristics.

I suppose what this type of approach provides is better prediction/planning by using more of what the model learnt during training, but it doesn't address the model being able to learn anything new.

It'll be interesting to see how this feels/behaves in practice.



I see this pattern coming where we're still able to say:

"It's not AGI - it's X, driven by Y-driven heuristics",

but that's going to effectively be an AGI if given enough compute/time/data.

Being able to describe the theory of how it's doing its thing sure is reassuring though.


Yes.. we have 60% that inception will happen within 24 months.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: