Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This sounds dumb - but what if you give it all the limericks MINUS the one you want it to answer about?

I think it will fail, but this actually seems like the cleanest way to demonstrate it.



Still not enough to rule out training on the data in the task affecting the task. It may be that it couldn't find it without it appearing in the training data, but even with that it also needs it in its context window to bridge enough connections from the training or whatever to do well on the task.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: