Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I love the Juniper voice in chatGPT4.

I am blown away having spent hours prompting GPT4o.

If it can give shorter answers in voice mode instead of lectures then a back and forth conversation with this much power can be quite interesting.

I still doubt I would use it that much though just because of how much is lost compared to the screen. Code and voice make no sense. The time between prompts usually requires quite a bit of thought for anything interesting that a conversation itself is only useful for things I have already asked it.

For me, gpt4 is already as useless as 3.5. I will never prompt gpt4 again. I can still push GPT4o over the edge in python but damn, it is pretty out there. Then the speed is really amazing.



You find GPT4o as accurate as GPT4? I feel like it sacrificed accuracy for speed, but that's just my first impression


Nothing impede you from telling it to keep the answers short via a pre-prompt




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: