Maybe, but necessary in certain situations. Abusive or misleading content (definition up for debate) can be censored to prevent harm. If I have a blueprint for a homemade explosive that a 12 year old can make in a day, should that be easily accessible?
Censorship only exists because people are more lazy than they are nefarious. The other aspect is protecting idiots from themselves.
Maybe as a society we then will have to have the conversations about cause/effect and personal responsibility that prepare children for adulthood.
When I was 9 my brother gave me a disc with all sorts of hacking and explosive making material. Jolly Rodger cookbook, handbooks on counterintel, hacking books about overflows.
I had great fun making thermite and smoke bombs and it led me to my career in software.
None of it was any more dangerous than climbing a tree because of good parenting.
In the majority of cases you maybe correct. But there are 12yr olds out there that don’t share your motives for building an explosive.
Personal responsibility is great when it works with proper parenting. You’re going to have to deal with the real world when schools around America start blowing up to match the ideal.
The nazis made similar excuses for their book burnings
Conservative religious nutjobs say the same shit when trying to ban books from libraries.
Everybody wants to ban the things they don't like, because most of us are weak-ass neophobes that bristle at the idea of thought that subverts these precious little needs. This is the whole problem.
