GPT-4 still makes plenty of mistakes when programming that reveal that it doesn’t fully understand what it’s doing. It’s very good, but it doesn’t reach the level of human intellect. Yet.
It is A and gets the G but fails somewhat on the I of AGI.
Yes, but we expect an AGI to not make mistakes that a human wouldn’t make.
This is easier to see with AI art. The artwork is very impressive but if the hand has the wrong number of fingers or the lettering is hilariously wrong, there’s a tendency to dismiss it.
Nobody complains that dall-e can’t produce artwork on par with Da Vinci because that’s not something we expect humans to do either.
For us to start considering these AIs “intelligent” they first need to nail what we consider “the basics”, no matter how hard those basics are for a machine.
It is A and gets the G but fails somewhat on the I of AGI.