It’s nonsense because that’s not what the proposal is. It’s focused on CSAM. It’s a bad law but what you and GP are saying is pure tinfoil-hat-level nonsense.
Is it appropriate to say that it's focused on CSAM?
A and B implies B. Scan all chats and only look for CSAM implies scan all chats.
Moreoever, will the government actually just look for CSAM and ignore everything else? Does this law punish the government for looking for things other than CSAM? If not, then there's no reason to believe that "only look for CSAM" is true as long as "scan all chats" is true.
