> So the best way to find good ideas is to have many ideas, try them out, take what works, and throw away the rest. But this is not what YC wants you to do. YC wants you to pick an idea that has market pull (or the potential for it), and to then dig a hole in the same spot until you reach the boiling magma. Because what if you stop digging just before you strike gold?
This is the hardest question of starting a startup (or trying to do anything novel), as far as I can tell, but this was not at all my experience with YC’s advice.
The overwhelming feeling is: be humble in the face of reality, try something and try to try it in a way that you can assess whether it’s working — quickly/cheaply — then try something new.
YC seemed perfectly fine with us either pivoting or staying the course so long as it seemed like we were trying to be intellectually honest with ourselves, and what more could you hope for? It’s not like they have the answer either — nor do they act like it.
Edit: Also YC explicitly advises against using VC feedback as signal on your idea. Ideally you’re pivoting well before you run up against “VCs won’t fund my next round,” because clearly things already weren’t working prior to that. You were trying new things and being honest about whether they were working, weren’t you?
As a fellow YC founder, I agree with everything you've said here. This article wrongly characterizes the YC experience. I think the author is attempting to apply a normal VC incentive structure to YC, but YC positions itself a little differently in the landscape.
As a former employer for a YC funded company that was shut down against the founder's wishes, forced to via the investor board; I can say that this article does not universally wrongly characterize the YC experience.
We had another year of runway in the bank and solid growth. ZIRP ended and the board nuked us from orbit.
This is the hardest question of starting a startup (or trying to do anything novel), as far as I can tell, but this was not at all my experience with YC’s advice.
The overwhelming feeling is: be humble in the face of reality, try something and try to try it in a way that you can assess whether it’s working — quickly/cheaply — then try something new.
YC seemed perfectly fine with us either pivoting or staying the course so long as it seemed like we were trying to be intellectually honest with ourselves, and what more could you hope for? It’s not like they have the answer either — nor do they act like it.
Edit: Also YC explicitly advises against using VC feedback as signal on your idea. Ideally you’re pivoting well before you run up against “VCs won’t fund my next round,” because clearly things already weren’t working prior to that. You were trying new things and being honest about whether they were working, weren’t you?