Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

If you go PEX, I highly recommend going the entire Uponor route and use the expansion tooling (get the powered one).

No need to worry about incorrect crimps and it just works.



If only Uponor would flesh out their fitting portfolio for 3/8”. 3/8” PEX is a near-perfect material for hot water distribution to sinks and showers — jurisdictions seem to have settled on the 0-2gpm range for sinks and showers, and 3/8” PEX high velocity at moderate pressure loss at these flows, which is exactly what you want. [0] But Uponor has very limited 3/8” parts, and using their brass fittings in that small size makes me a bit uneasy due to potential erosion issues. Give me stainless steel or plastic, please, or at least something where the very narrow part that inserts into the 3/8” PEX tube is highly resistant to fast-moving hot water.

If you consider push-to-connect fittings acceptable, something like this could be very nice for connecting tubing to shower valves:

https://www.johnguest.com/us/en/cts-fittings/prolock/threade...

(3/8” is permitted by code, but not by the tables in the UPC - actual math is required.)

[0] PEX, unlike copper, tolerates fairly high velocity hot water. Copper has a delicate passive layer on the inside, and scrubbing it off will erode the pipe. The interior of a PEX pipe, is, drumroll please, just PEX, which is a rather tough polymer that is not going to be easily eroded away.


Both PEX-A and PEX-B require a separate tools (segment of the tool, or swappable tool head) to perform the pipe to fitting connection. In most cases, it’s easier to just upsize the pipe and have your final termination point be the size you need. I’d rather have very cheap 1/2 inch available than have slightly more expensive 1/2 and 3/8 inch. If needed anything that required the 3/8 in, I would just use copper because it’s likely a very small and isolated case.


You’re missing my point.

For domestic hot water, for the connection from whatever part of the system stays hot (the header, the recirc loop, etc) to the fixture, the amount of time and wasted water needed to get hot water to the fixture is directly proportional to the volume of the interior of the pipe, and for a fixed length of pipe, it’s inversely proportional to velocity. So you want the narrowest pipe you can get away with. 3/8” PEX has about half the interior cross-sectional area as 1/2”. This means you get hot water about twice as fast. 3/8” PEX loses about 26 psi/100 ft at 2 gpm and much less at lower flow. If you have 40 psi water and you have a short-ish pipe, that’s usually fine. Or if you have higher pressure and a longer pipe, you’re still fine.

The issue here has that, while the 3/8” PEX is near-perfect for this application, the rest of the system is not amazing. Your sink is likely (sigh) “3/8 female compression”, aka non-standard 9/16 UNEF or so, but the flow rate is well under 2 gpm, so this isn’t a big deal - use whatever adapter you like.

But your shower likely has 1/2” NPT brass female threads. To get the benefit of 3/8” PEX, you need to adapt it at the shower.

> If needed anything that required the 3/8 in, I would just use copper because it’s likely a very small and isolated case.

No, don’t do that. From the horse’s mouth (this particular horse very much wanting you to use copper):

https://copper.org/applications/plumbing/cth/design-installa...

> [Copper Pipe] Water Velocity Limitations

> To avoid excessive system noise and the possibility of erosion-corrosion, the designer should not exceed flow velocities of 8 feet per second for cold water and 5 feet per second in hot water up to approximately 140°F. In systems where water temperatures routinely exceed 140°F, lower flow velocities such as 2 to 3 feet per second should not be exceeded. In addition, where 1/2-inch and smaller tube sizes are used, to guard against localized high velocity turbulence due to possibly faulty workmanship (e.g. burrs at tube ends which were not properly reamed/deburred) or unusually numerous, abrupt changes in flow direction, lower velocities should be considered. Locally aggressive water conditions can combine with these two considerations to cause erosion-corrosion if system velocities are too high.

A 2.2 gpm shower head fed by 3/8” copper is out of spec.

I have personally seen copper tube fail when used with plain water at excessive velocity. It’s not pretty. Fortunately it was outdoors. Don’t do this inside your walls. Most vendors seem to think 8 ft/sec in PEX at 140F is fine, though.


> 3/8” is permitted by code, but not by the tables in the UPC

Can you elaborate on this please?

It takes 90 seconds for hot water to flow from my water heater to my kitchen in the winter. I’m not sure if I have 1/2 or 3/8 pex (I’d have to crawl under the house to check). I’ve been thinking of adding a small Bosch water heater under the sink or a recirculation like, but maybe I should reduce the size of the pipe too


Code will have requirements like "pipe must flow X gallons/min" or something - and then a table of pipes of various materials and if they meet the requirements at a given length.

But they don't list all possible pipes, or all lengths. And the argument is that 3/8 PEX will flow to requirements and have a smaller amount of water sitting in it.


I think everyone just uses 1/2 and doesn't have junctions at all.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: