"Blast radius"? Bit dramatic. Where's the trauma normally associated with blast zones? I don't see it.
Who are these "real people" you talk of? I find it interesting in this age of diversity and acceptance of differences, that a "Musk character" can't exist without a constant deluge of backlash, ridicule and grumpiness!
The vast majority of twitter staff should have been laid off years ago, and would have been getting laid off now as the US continues to experience credit tightening. Musk just did it faster.
Twitter would have fallen had it maintained such a financial burden in salaries, which were also seemingly waste in many places given the enormous 80% percentage after which the company didn't fall.
Would you have preferred every employee, including the most loyal and hard-working, to lose their jobs too?
Musk paid billions too much for Twitter. So at least a few of those real people you're worried about, are now very rich.
Companies have layoffs. Are you saying the thousands of layoffs at Meta, or any other tech businesses in recent times, are "good layoffs", but Twitter layoffs were "bad layoffs"? I don't understand your position here. You seem to have an emotional response about the welfare of tech sector people you don't know.
If you have Twitter on your resume, I'd expect it would open a few doors when job hunting. Your concern for their welfare is odd to say the least.
It would be "fun" if it only affected him. But there are real people who get caught in the blast radius of his "fun."