Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

At that level I think I'd just put the images in the database.


That's an option, but I want to keep things simple and the assumption is usually "filesystem" but weirdly most libraries assume S3 usage. I don't think I've seen native support for db-stored images in any of the libraries I use, which is sad but a reality.


Maybe not directly in libraries but there's a few programs to make a fuse filesystem backed by a database.


Ya cant just throw em at a blob type field/column?


In the git repo even


The images are supplied by the users, so that wouldn't be an option




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: