I 100% appreciate you linking to this.

Also this game is interesting and I don't mind at all if they are using the game to make a point. Perhaps we all need to learn this lesson. Especially elected officials could stand to learn the problem with moderation.

Mike Masnick gets really upset when you point out the motives for his work. Keep doing it, thanks.

The game is accurate, played it and it matched my experience well.

Does this mean that we should disregard it? What do we do if the person we dont like is correct

Skimming the key takeaways their agenda seems mostly reasonable? Did I miss something?