There are vulnerable bootloaders signed with the UEFI CA. Disabling less heavily vetted CA on devices that are being sold as basically hardened, makes sense. But yeah, one aspect of it might be making it easier for enterprises, that's a large focus.
Well that's what the revocation list is for, but yes I can imagine choosing the nuclear option of just dropping the CA is attractive because it's less work for everyone involved.
It was a leading question, answer to which only you can know based on your threat model. I did however say what you can do if you don't trust Microsoft, which also makes the question quite irrelevant.