When will people learn that trusting a (possibly unreliable) third party with your money was exactly the sort of thing that bitcoin was supposed to obviate?
But banks offer better protection for my money than can be afforded in a home settings. Quite the opposite with BitCoins. My TrueCrypt volume with keyfiles that I keep on my person and in a safebox with my BitCoins inside is far superior to... well... ANY internet-connected service.
Out of curiosity, what size do you set your TC volume to, and what size is your wallet.dat? Is the possibility of wallet.dat exceeding the size of backup.tc a problem?
I can't imagine anyone's wallet.dat being that large... Plus you can always create new TC volumes. My wallet is under 200K right now. Alternatively, especially for such a small file, plenty of other per-file encryption schemes would be just as applicable.
but there's no reason to do it all at once. if you are trading 1 btc for money there should be an automated way to do the transfer in increasing steps, after each of which the other party would reply - so transfer 0.0001, 0.001, 0.01 etc. til you are done. You wouldn't lose much, and you could vary the rate depending on how much you trusted the other party.
But there's no reason to leave a quarter of a million dollars in BitCoins in an untrusted 3rd party's hands. Unless you're lazy or naive. It takes almost no effort to transfer them to your own wallet which can be trivially encrypted or stored on a device unconnected to the Internet.
Yes, it is: assuming you use client side encryption, an online storage company never needs to know your secrets. It's the difference between a trusted and untrusted third party.
Most Bitcoin enthusiasts are speculators. These exchanges and online wallets are popular because they allow speculators to respond instantly to opportunities.