I think an equilibrium would be reached. For example, the US is probably OK with Russia having 10% of hash power if the US has 10%, and so on.
However, that particular example may be unrealistic, because the US would probably choose poverty over accepting bitcoin.
That sounds truly decentralized. /s
I think an equilibrium would be reached. For example, the US is probably OK with Russia having 10% of hash power if the US has 10%, and so on.
However, that particular example may be unrealistic, because the US would probably choose poverty over accepting bitcoin.