> But we have always known that someone with sufficient cleverness may be able to slip vulnerabilities past reviewers of whatever project.
...which is why the interestingness of this project depends on how clever they were - which I'm not able to evaluate, but which someone would need to before they could possibly invalidate the idea.
...which is why the interestingness of this project depends on how clever they were - which I'm not able to evaluate, but which someone would need to before they could possibly invalidate the idea.
> (and unethical)
How is security research unethical, exactly?