>This is when it is determined that the opinions expressed are detrimental to the human race and largely false.
Then any speech that threatens power structures will be determined to be detrimental, and banned.
The only way to protect speech is to protect speech, even if you dislike it. That's why the ACLU, before they were coopted as they are today, defended nazis in illinois.
Don't be short sighted, be long sighted. Today its nazis, 60 years ago its was activists. Same rules.
I'm not saying that it's a clear cut issue. I think there are definite cases when freedom of speech causes more harm then good. If someone will preach that we must kill every single person with 8 fingers, for example, we will curtail his freedom with very little consideration.
Then any speech that threatens power structures will be determined to be detrimental, and banned.
The only way to protect speech is to protect speech, even if you dislike it. That's why the ACLU, before they were coopted as they are today, defended nazis in illinois.
Don't be short sighted, be long sighted. Today its nazis, 60 years ago its was activists. Same rules.