But who would support it? While a formally verified functional approach may satisfy one's doctorate requirements, the author will graduate and move onto blockchain development, leaving behind an exit-vim code base that no other engineer could possibly understand without the equivalent training. Upon receiving said training, an engineer would also take newly acquired doctorate and also move onto blockchain development. Essentially, supporting a formally verified functional approach to exiting Vim creates a pipeline of well-credentialed and rigorously trained professionals for blockchain development. If Vim were, however, put on the blockchain, we may be able to address this concern and you can get what you wanted.
Since the real world is not necessarily deterministic as demonstrated by the methods using random(), I hope to see more development in stochastical methods describing parameters of probability distributions of successful exits.
In the face of vim's unyielding resilience to exiting, I think we may need to devise a new algorithm for this using quantum superposition. I heard IBM can help with that.
