A hypothetical, *completely clean* energy source is objectively better than one ... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		pmiller2 on Sept 28, 2019 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Dog-walking startup Wag raised $300M, then things ... A hypothetical, completely clean energy source is objectively better than one that emits greenhouse gasses, on its face.

LanceH on Sept 28, 2019 [–]

I'll counter with a hypothetical way to clean up greenhouse gases using fossil fuels.

That is, until something can be put into production, it is not a superior product.

pmiller2 on Sept 28, 2019 | [–]

Ok, let’s add “renewable” to the equation. How do fossil fuels stack up to a clean, renewable source of energy?

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact