Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

With the common complaints about the various dynamic languages of choice being slow, I don't understand why Lua hasn't gotten more attention. The standard interpreter is many times faster than Ruby and Python, and LuaJIT is several times faster still. It's also an elegant language with a tiny core. I wish it had implicit returns, but nothing's perfect.


> The standard interpreter is many times faster than Ruby and Python

http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u32/which-programming-lang...

No it's not "many times faster". Standard Lua is just a little faster than CPython.

LuaJIT2 kicks everyone's ass, though.


If someone is that concerned about speed, what's wrong with just using a compiled language to begin with?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: