For breaching the contractual agreement, something the court has also observed and ruled on.
This man indeed paid for something but then used it in a way that was an abuse from the contractual perspective and (saying this as a regular person) also from a common sense perspective. He showed a lot of bad faith and this undermined his case.
The lack of notification from AA of purported abuse should have been enough to get the case thrown out.
The abuse being serious enough to force AA to revoke the pass... yet not serious enough that they discovered or communicated it before they decided to revoke the pass?
For breaching the contractual agreement, something the court has also observed and ruled on.
This man indeed paid for something but then used it in a way that was an abuse from the contractual perspective and (saying this as a regular person) also from a common sense perspective. He showed a lot of bad faith and this undermined his case.