The next difference you might encounter further down the line is how many user space programs act differently from Linux. Like for example route, netstat, tar and many more.
Why not fault Linux for not having the same interfaces as the BSD tools? The BSD ones were there first.
The reality is that the systems are different and OpenBSD is not trying to be Linux. Faulting either one just for not being the same as the other is silly.
> Why not fault Linux for not having the same interfaces as the BSD tools? The BSD ones were there first.
>> when going from Linux to OpenBSD
or you could rephrase it, when going from more popular to less popular.
He isn't finding fault, he's expressing a practical issue that is relevant to the more common viewpoint (including the author of the article, whose audience is curious linux users). Contrary to the title of the article, which is agnostic and what you are arguing for, the article is actually written from a specific POV, for a specific audience:
> This list is aimed at people who are used to Linux and are curious about OpenBSD.
Why not fault Linux for not having the same interfaces as the BSD tools? The BSD ones were there first.
The reality is that the systems are different and OpenBSD is not trying to be Linux. Faulting either one just for not being the same as the other is silly.