> how you are trying to quote parts of witnesses' words just to prove opinion, which is strictly opposite to what he actually told
Third time: I quoted exact person's words, where he said that he waited until exit will be freed.
> so he waited few seconds but there were no issue with the people taking their luggage.
there is nothing about few seconds in his words, and he couldn't see luggage problem because was 10 rows from business class rows.
I think you follow some strategy to flood discussion with low quality arguments with hope opponent will give up, so I give up, I will not respond you anymore.
> and he couldn't see luggage problem because was 10 rows from business class rows
And you were closer, of course, lol.
If _last_ survivor says there was no issue with luggage, there is no reason to think opposite. If he would be put at risk just because somebody's luggage, he would definitely speak out.
> there is nothing about few seconds in his words
1) Evacuation took 55 seconds.
2) Quote: "I can't say nothing about the luggage, I had no issue with it on my way"
3) Official statement says that rumors about luggage were just rumors and people who died had no time to even unlock their seatbelts, because died in a few seconds because of toxic smoke.
Third time: I quoted exact person's words, where he said that he waited until exit will be freed.
> so he waited few seconds but there were no issue with the people taking their luggage.
there is nothing about few seconds in his words, and he couldn't see luggage problem because was 10 rows from business class rows.
I think you follow some strategy to flood discussion with low quality arguments with hope opponent will give up, so I give up, I will not respond you anymore.