Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

China's strategy has always been the same - wait for others to bleed in their blood and money on R&D and when the technology is ripe and well working, simply rip it off effortlessly and sell it a lower price point, most of the times not even caring about quality/safety compromises.

We saw this with the Japanese bullet trains, we saw this with self driving tech, and now it's display tech.

You could argue that the consumers benefit the most over time. But it's definitely unfair to those who have dedicated their lives to researching these technologies, only to see it get stolen and even re-licensed as China's own (as what happened with the bullet trains).

The rest of the world should stop playing by Chinese's rules and be firm in their stance like the US - Eg. if China doesn't enforce strict IP rules, then people should seek alternatives and stop dealing with them. Even India/Vietnam/Malaysia/etc. are better bets in comparison. Especially when these schemes are sponsored by the Chinese government 9 times out of 10.



Wasn’t that Japan’s strategy in the 70s and South Korea’s in the 90s?

And I’m pretty sure that was the US strategy during the Industrial Revolution. Or the European strategy when it came to stealing Chinese silk making methods.

I guess great powers steal alike.


Whataboutism. As always, two Wrongs don’t make a Right, and OP is not even talking about the morality of it (everyone agrees it is immoral) but about countermeasures.


> As always, two Wrongs don’t make a Right,

So US, Japan, Korea got the advantage by copying why not give the same advantage to China?

If your argument is because its wrong then are the other countries who benefited by copying going to be punished?


Why is it immoral? It is knowledge and information must be free. Copyright and patents etc are only holding mankind back.


> Why is it immoral?

Theft is immoral. I can't just sneak into your home, steal your stuff and walk away saying you're holding mankind back, can I? That's the analogy in the OP.


The argument is weather exclusivity to information and it's applications should be something that can be owned and therefore be stolen.


Samsung hasn't lost anything, they can still make the panels themselves.

The Chinese companies merely duplicated the know how.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: