By "drugs" I meant "pharmaceuticals marketed as treating illness," not recreational drugs.
Whatever someone feels about recreational drugs, there's a huge difference between freedom to put drugs in your body vs. freedom to advertise drugs for a medical purpose.
The former is (consistent with my argument) legal by default. The latter is not.
Whatever someone feels about recreational drugs, there's a huge difference between freedom to put drugs in your body vs. freedom to advertise drugs for a medical purpose.
The former is (consistent with my argument) legal by default. The latter is not.