Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

As a former submariner who has had used clock for inertial navigation or for similar weapons systems 1/3 of a second over 100 hours is terrible.


I mean, it's not an atomic clock, but I'm comparing it to the 32.768KHz RTC crystals I use with consumer microchips. If super-precise isolated accuracy were actually important, I assume they would use a rubidium or cesium oscillator.


1/3 of a second in 100 hours is basically 1ppm, or TXCO levels of accuracy, so pretty good i'd have thought, even for a submarine INS?


USN ballistic missile submarines deploy the most accurate INS in the world (ESGN), and that system is used in conjunction with another advanced gyro.


Not sure about that. ESGN is old technology, since submarines don't need that much accuracy. For example, space probes, ballistic missiles, smart artillery shells/rockets/missiles and so on would all appear to have multiple orders of magnitude better accuracy than submarines, in the fractional ppb ranges, rather than tens of ppm. [0][1]

0. https://www.sto.nato.int/publications/STO%20Meeting%20Procee...

1. http://users.cecs.anu.edu.au/~Jonghyuk.Kim/teaching/Inertial...


Here is a 2 RU atomic clock on ebay for context: https://www.ebay.com/itm/Antelope-Audio-Isochrone-10M-Rubidi...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: