Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It's a lot bigger than conventional ls, but compared to a node.js implementation or Java program the description "small, fast" seems justified.


Well, I have to admit, it is smaller than a docker container of alpine Linux containing the ls binary! Still doesn't mean it's monstrously large for no good reason.


Why would I want to compare apples to oranges? Though admittedly in this crazy day and age someone has probably already reimplemented coreutils in node.js just because.


I have seen my fair share of javascript-based console applications. My guess is that the author tries to assure us that exa is no such thing but behaves reasonably for a console application (not gigantic, not incredibly slow) and makes his statements in that light.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: