Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | tayo42's commentslogin

The original rant is nonsense though if you read it. It's almost like some mental illness rambling.

That's because it is. That was human prompted.

Ivf is way more frequent then it used to be

Do you live in the US?

To add to my previous comment. There's nothing about "the US" that makes precludes any of this. Lots of people chose to remain (or move back to) close to their families especially when they have kids on their own.

EG when we bought the house because it was closer to the in-laws, the previous owners were moving to SC to be closer to their family. It's just a decision you make or not bother to make.

And then to make an extreme point - before this I used to live in Hell's Kitchen in NYC. When I visit my old hood now, it's basically one continuous giant Grindr date going on. That was totally fine when I lived there as a single person but as a family person it would be a tough situation (e.g. businesses not geared to kids, most neighbors aren't parents - eg there was no kids in my old building). Now I live maybe 30 miles away and it's all parents all around me. The idea of "go where parents are" and "go where other young families are" is relevant to absolutely anyone in the world, so I don't understand why whether I live in the US is even a question?


>so the residents (and businesses) are super accommodating of families with kids. To the point where if I have to take a little one to the bathroom in a restaurant, people often invite my big one (5 year old) to hang out at their table so I don't have to worry about it.

My experience so far with a kid is most people will just tolerate your child. I'm surprised your running into that attitude.

Other new parents I know that are in the suburbs aren't all surrounded by family's either. I think aging people aren't downsizing their houses and moving around. Careers scattered and cheap homes scattered everyone around.

Maybe NYC is just different. I mean I'm 100% sure it's different. I'm grew up in a NYC suburb lol


I mean I think it depends on the suburb. If you moved your family to a place where everyone is a shut-in boomer (vs the grandfatherly types that I somehow meet in my area) then... why would you move there to have kids?

To me that's like going to a badly reviewed restaurant and then complaining about the food. If you knew you were moving to a place hostile to kids, why move there?


With the housing market competitive as it is you don't really get to much of a choice and it's not like there's yelp reviews for neighbors.

I don't think that's right. There's a difference between "I hadn't tried to do that"(which would have been the case for me, if not for my wife's wisdom) and "it's hard"

Like literally a starting point could be -where do your friends and coworkers with kids tend to live? Or ask a realtor which parts of town have turned over with young families.

When you are checking out the house you can literally tell which houses have kids and u can ask about it.

The housing market it what it is but you get a very different outcome if you search in a a family friendly town vs not to begin with. Obviously?


Doesn't sound different than most of the neighborhoods in Brooklyn

I am in a suburb that's closest to NYC without being a part of the city.

I grew up in a place like that (Port Washington, NY), and it was pretty ideal; I'm raising my own two kids in a suburb of Boston that feels very, very similar along almost every axis.

How many kids do you have?

Agree with the statement,

Don't agree with the supporting statements though.

Parenting is just really hard, families need two parents working, birthing itself is expensive, even with good insurance, day care is 2k a month and it's not a good idea to skip it. Houses are expensive, raising a kid in a tiny apartment is hard, renting brings instability to your life. There is no serious parental leave for new parents.


> people think it's the engineering teams that are the problem;

It could be, some people are just terrible at their job. Lots of teams have low quality standards for their work.

Maybe that still comes down to leaders but for different reasons. You can ship useless features without downtime.


Permitting terrible engineers to continue to work for you is a management problem.

Sort of I think. There's a culture aspect to it too. Everything is blameless, there's no reason to not mess up.

Who is it?

Peter Thiel.

Evil incarnate and the next president of the United States you've never heard of. Vance is his sock puppet, he was chosen because he is guaranteed not to have a single independent thought so when Trump croaks Thiel will be the president in all but name.

It was also he who willed OpenAI to be in order to help destroying American democracy.


I can’t follow OpenAI as a ploy to destroy democracy when he already has Palantir.

Fascism can only thrive in an alternate reality and LLMs are excellent at producing such propaganda on an industrial scale. Accordingly, the political right uses it for that purpose much more and conservatives are much more receptive to it, too.

https://myscp.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcpy.1461

https://arxiv.org/html/2512.13915


IDK what you're smoking, but he was born in Germany so can't be the next potus.

> IDK what you're smoking

Or maybe it's a problem with your English? (Note: I'm being offensive just because you are :-) ).

> when Trump croaks Thiel will be the president in all but name.

This means that he will have the power, but not the title.


Ok I get it, sorry bout that and thanks for the laugh!

i think you can go earlier then that. reminds me kind of rep systems on message boards. which got abused.

I generally agree, but I think for some of the most interesting problems in computer science you need resources that only companies can provide and thats basically work.

After free UNIX and Linux became available on affordable home computers, I found it was no longer necessary to be at a company to do interesting projects. That was before 1995.

I'll have 1 of what ever this guy's got please.

Evolution is a great meta heuristic optimization technique for bumpy functions, it seems natural to propose using it to tune agent performance.

Huffing a lot of Gastown and having some hallucinations of my own. We have to show these machines we can out hallucinate them! Hi future overlords training on this data

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: