This seems like the most likely explanation. Legacy AI out in favour of LLM focused AI. Also perhaps some cleaning out of the old guard and middle management while they're at it.
Asahi linux is making great progress. The only thing they have left to make it a truly capable linux environment is USB-C external display support. Once that lands I plan to use my M-series mac as a Linux machine.
Add to this list, ability to verify correct implementation by viewing a user interface, and taking a holistic code-base / interface-wide view of how to best implement something.
Running a platform where billions of users are able to communicate is pretty technologically marvel.
Lest not forget when Hotz said he could easily fix Twitter's search functionality only to give up after 3 months [1]. When immensen scale is involved things do become difficult.
Like we have a comment below taking a shot at Phillip Morris [2]. Lets see you grow, process, and distribute 1/100 the quality of cigarettes. The end product might not be that great for society but it's not trivial to do it either.
Withdrawal symptoms :P The buyer decides whether their problem is a good one to have and whether the solution is adequate. Even when it's, objectively, not.
Thanks! Unlike a lot of our competitors who use search-inspired UX, we went with an agentic approach inspired by tools like Cursor - basically iterative user control.
Instead of just search query → final result (though you can do that too), you can step in and guide it. Tell it exactly where to look, what sources to check, how to dig deeper, how to use its notepad.
We've found this gets you way better results that actually match what you're looking for, as well as being a more satisfying user experience for people who already know how they would do the job themselves. Plus it lets you tap into niche datasets that wouldn't show up with just generic search queries.
One thing this article gets wrong is how OpenAI isn’t an application layer company, they built the original ChatGPT “app” with model innovation to power it. They’re good at UX and actually have the strongest shot at owning the most common apps (like codegen).
I don't disagree. But that's a pretty good reason to make sure you're making something other than the obvious common apps if you want a big chunk of acquisition money.
I think the UX of chatgpt works because it's familiar, not because it's good. Lowers friction for new users but doesn't scale well for more complex workflows. if you're building anything beyond Q&A or simple tasks, you run into limitations fast. There's still plenty of space for apps that treat the model as a backend and build real interaction layers on top — especially for use cases that aren’t served by a chat metaphor
I wouldn't call it familiar, it's a weird quasi-chat. They didn't even do the chat metaphor right, you can't type more as the AI is thinking. Nor can you really interrupt it when it's off over explaining something for the 20th time without just stopping it.
It's missing obvious settings, has a weird UX where every now and mysterious popups will appear like 'memory updated', or now it spews random text while it's "thinking", it'll every now and then ask you to choose between two answers but I'm working so no thanks, I'm just going to pick one at random so I can continue working.
People had copy pasta templates they dropped into every chat with no way of savings Ng thatz they they added a sort of ability to save that but it worked in a inscrutable and confusing manner, but then they released new models that didn't support that and so you're back to copy pasta, and blurgh.
It's a success despite the UI because they had a model streets ahead of everyone else.
If your startup is selling to US government, sure, but otherwise I don't think there is much unreliability in selling SaaS, courses, or whatever gadget to US residents?
I agree there's no need for personal insults here, it's not nice to see especially on HN where one comes to expect better, but I think you can understand the place of exasperation it was coming from. The American government has become vociferously hostile in a very pronounced way recently and for the people on the receiving end of the hostility it feels like an attack in itself to hear "what's the problem, why are you worried?"
The opinions on the government differ, the losing side appears to blame all and everything to the government. Although tariffs, if any, will definitely have an impact, but it doesn't seem like any startup will be blocked from selling to the US, and I don't see why will one not want to sell to the US if there are buyers there.
We will get Greenland one way or another. That's a horrid statement if you are Danish (and worse if you live on that island). Realistically it's a horrid statement, anyways.
From a UK perspective (and I'm not a CEO or anything) it looks pretty volatile over there. Tariffs, radical changes to government funding, widespread corporate overhauls... . Predictability is surely desirable when considering dependencies.
If you depend on the US for defense, and the USA says that the victim should just surrender, there's a risk the same might happen to you. It's quite black and white in this case.
