Hello! Have you ever felt like too important to answer questions? Guess what! This one weird trick will turn you into a French General in the boardroom!

I kind of regret calling it Straussian because of the baggage that comes with that label. The key differentiator here compared to exoteric/esoteric is the stabilization mechanism: social costs to either upgrading one’s own understanding, or upgrading someone else’s understanding. That’s what keeps the readings differentiated and therefore the tiered structure stable. Keeping the structure encourages the memes survival, because it widens the acceptability of the message to meet audiences where they are. I think I need a few more examples and I ought to make this point a little more explicit.

Soon he may be making vanity license plates

Isn't the post more about the interesting capabilities of the language rather than an engineering context?

It's entirely possible that I'm being unnecessarily pedantic, but this doesn't feel like a post about "capabilities" so much as "hacky workarounds".

Maybe my years of contributing to undisciplined codebases has made me bitter but TypeScript has ways to solve these problems and it hurts to see more attention brought to hacks than the interesting (and underdocumented) solutions TypeScript already has. Given that roughly half of the documentation is in the damn changelog, TypeScript is especially in need of independent content that highlight features (not hacks) of the language

What methods would you want to bring more attention to?

I remember the days of countless insane, boutique javascript libraries. React's ubiquity is a victory - let's not encourage throwing something away in the name of some vague notion of "innovation".

Does performing gradient descent on token input embeddings lead to interpretable results? And if not, why?

After working pretty closely with vLLM and SGLang over the past few months, this is EXACTLY what I had envisioned what a successor project would look like - analyzing an operation dependency graph and then fusing (or, at a minimum, scheduling tasks smarter). Congrats to the team.

Thanks a lot for your positive feedback! We believe that MPK can enhance existing LLM serving systems, especially for low-latency LLM serving. We are very excited about the opportunity to collaborate with others on direction.

It is unclear to me is whether Kent recovered his cognitive ability or not. He says he has, "thanks to the genie" (which seems to be his name for coding LLMs). Does this mean that with a genie, he is now able to produce like he was before? Or that he used a genie to help "re-train" himself?

Robots that can do anything.

Is it though? He's perfectly positioned to do so.