Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | hollownobody's commentslogin

Your wife doesn't let you use WeChat because you could find prostitutes? Sorry, this confused me. If you want to hire a prostitute, not having access to WeChat won't block you from that. Or is this more about avoiding temptation?


It's more that WeChat is seen as solely for prostitution, similar to OnlyFans. I know they're a legit app, but my wife does not agree.

WeChat has location based search. Live near a university? Live near a school? There's options that open up that no one can compete with.


720 tool calls? Amazing!


Where'd you get 720 from?


Math pun… 6! = Factorial(6) = 720


Whoosh, it went right over my head.


the _6!_



For every example where someone over predicted the time it would take for a breakthrough, there are at least 10 examples of people being too optimistic with their predictions.

And with AGI, you also have the likes of Sam Altman making up bullshit claims just to pump up the investment into OpenAI. So I wouldn’t take much of their claims seriously either.

LLMs are a fantastic invention. But they’re far closer to SMS text predict than they are to generalised intelligence.

Though what you might see is OpenAI et al redefine the term “AGI” just so they can say they’ve hit that milestone, again purely for their own financial gain.


Are there any predictions you'd want to make? Not about AGI, but about an intermediate goalpost you think we won't reach in the next 5 years


in the history of AI usually people overestimate how long a capability is reached. There are very few counterexamples to this (GPT5 capability level might be one of them though)


This reminds me how, a few years after the first fission power plant, Teller, Bhaba, and other nuclear physicists of the 1950s were convinced fusion power plants were about as far away as the physicists of today still predict they are.

I'm cautiously optimistic of each technology, but the point is it's easy to find bullshit predictions without actually gaining any insight into what will happen with a given technology.


"AI tools are bad", says company most suffering by the use of AI tools


Try Claude code, codex-cli, or gemini-cli. They are CLIs, as their name indicates. The Gemini one is free.


Amazing that I got four responses and this is the only one which offers some mildly useful information.


Try o3 please. Via UI.


He posted on Twitter about the coin and a few hours after the rug pull said that he hadn't done any research.


AFAIK, these models can't "look" at the plots they build. So it is necessary to send the screenshots, otherwise they will never notice the gorilla.


Try reading Qualityland, by Marc-Uwe Kling. It's SF (funny SF) about this exact premise.


One option is that people you talk to look for the stuff to discuss.

E.g. person A talks about bouldering with person B. Person A then continues with their day while person B googles bouldering terms.

A and B then receive both bouldering ads. Person By because of the googling and person A because of proximity to person B.

Person A then assumes the phone spies what they say, but it doesn't. Location is enough.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: