Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | cornstalks's commentslogin

There are way cheaper options than the Anker Solix 3800. Here are some options, in no particular order:

- $3,300: 10 kWh with 2x EG4 WallMount Indoor 100Ah.

- $3,110: 14 kWh with 1x WallMount Indoor 280Ah.

- $2,690: 10 kWh with 1x Deye RW F10.2 B

- Will Prowse's YouTube channel has reviewed several battery builds that are >10 kWh and near $2,000, but they're DIY assembly.


Batteryhookup has batteries for $40/kWh :) just put together a off grid setup for a friend and 8kwh cost $400 in parts!

I'll check that out. The goal is to get to something that runs all night (or almost all night) with around 1kwh output using as little space as possible. I've just started poking around, but this'll help.

In the third world there's plenty of sunlight, but you don't need the power during the day necessarily. That price'll get to $400 for storage, $400 for panels, which is ballpark.


And still much more than the cost of the solar panels, which was GP's point.

GP only has two panels that generate 960 W (I’m going to generously assume NMOT and not STC). That’s hardly anything, and certainly not what I would use to try and charge 10 kWh of battery like they’re suggesting.

But sure, I agree it would help if battery prices came down.


During the day when nobody's home the panels are charging the battery.

Obviously more panels are better.

The goal is to be able to run a small window AC unit and various small appliances at night. That's a tremendous quality-of-life upgrade for a huge number of people. $1000 USD would make it somewhat affordable, in the window for a viable small business/NGO opportunity. There's obviously a whole lot more (installation, labor, maintenance, etc), but material cost needs to be low for it to work.


> Zenroom is programmable in the no-code English-like language Zencode.

Isn't that just code? Where do people draw the line between no-code and code?


libjxl is is <112,888 lines of code, about 3 orders of magnitude less than you're 100M+ claim.


Do people really not know what a hyperbole is?


100M+ lines of code isn't a hyperbole for some codebases, though. google3 is estimated at about 2 billion lines of code, for example.

Maybe it was hyperbole. But if it was it wasn't obvious to me, unfortunately.


That story doesn’t work for people with depression who otherwise have very good lives.

I grew up in a stable household with a loving family and both parents present and supportive. I’ve never had financial hardship, either as a kid depending on my parents to provide or as an adult providing for myself and family. I did very well in school, had plenty of friends, never had enemies, never got bullied or even talked bad about in social circles (so far as I know…). I have no traumatic memories.

I could go on and on, but despite having a virtually perfect life on paper, I have always struggled with depression and suicidal ideation. It wasn’t until my wife sat down and forced me to talk to a psychiatrist and start medication that those problems actually largely went away.

In other words, I don’t think there’s a metaphorical “cow” that could have helped me. It’s annoying we don’t understand what causes depression or how antidepressants help, and their side effects suck. But for some of us, it’s literally life saving in a way nothing else has ever been.


First of all, I want to write that I am glad you found something that worked so that you are able to remain here with us.

Though, I am curious about the, "otherwise have very good lives" part.

Whose definition are you using? It seems the criteria you laid out fits a "very good life" in a sociological sense -- very important, sure. You could very well have the same definition, and perhaps that is what I am trying to ask. Would you say you were satisfied in life? Despite having a good upbringing, were you (prior to medication) content or happy?

I am by no means trying to change your opinion nor invalidate your experiences. I just struggle to understand how that can be true.

As someone that has suffered with deep depressive bouts many times over, I just cannot subscribe to the idea that depression is inherently some sort of disorder of the brain. In fact, I am in the midst of another bout now. One that's lasted about 3 or so years.

To me, I have always considered emotions/states like depression and anxiety to be signals. A warning that something in one's current environment is wrong -- even if consciously not known or difficult to observe. And if anyone is curious, I have analyzed this for myself, and I believe the etiology of my issues are directly linked to my circumstances/environment.

> I don’t think there’s a metaphorical “cow” that could have helped me.

The smart-ass in me can't help but suggest that maybe medication was your cow?


> Whose definition are you using?

To be honest, I've never really thought about it... I suppose I mean in both a sociological and self fulfillment way.

> Would you say you were satisfied in life? Despite having a good upbringing, were you (prior to medication) content or happy?

I would say "yes" overall. Aside from the depression (typically manifesting as a week or two of me emotionally spiraling down to deep dark places every month or so), I was very happy and satisfied. That's what makes the depression so annoying for me. It makes no sense compared to my other aspects of life.

> In fact, I am in the midst of another bout now. One that's lasted about 3 or so years.

*fist bump*

> To me, I have always considered emotions/states like depression and anxiety to be signals. A warning that something in one's current environment is wrong -- even if consciously not known or difficult to observe. And if anyone is curious, I have analyzed this for myself, and I believe the etiology of my issues are directly linked to my circumstances/environment.

I think that's a great hypothesis so long as it's not a blanket applied to everyone (which I don't think you're doing, to be clear; I mention this only because it is what motivated my original response to the other commenter).

I don't want to go into private details of family members without their permission, but I will say that given the pervasive depression in my family and mental health issues like schizophrenia and bipolar disorders (neither of which I have, thank goodness), I feel like there's something biologically... wrong (for lack of a better word?)... with us, particularly since you can easily trace this through my mother's side.

> The smart-ass in me can't help but suggest that maybe medication was your cow?

Ha fair. I interpreted the story to be about depression being a symptom of your situation (job, health, etc.) and if you just fixed that then there's no need for medication. That definitely makes sense in some (many? most?) situations. But not all, unfortunately.


Take my baseless speculation for what it's worth, but could it be that you were depressed because your life was too easy? We humans are meant to struggle through adversity. Can you really appreciate your financial security if you've never faced financial insecurity, or appreciate companionship if you've never experienced loneliness?


It’s a reasonable question but I doubt it. We weren’t affluent at all and I worked my butt off for everything. And that’s good, because I agree that if things are too easy it turns into a curse.


> I don’t think there’s a metaphorical “cow” that could have helped me.

The medication is the cow for you. In this story your support system figured out what would work best for you, which was medication, and facilitated that.

It’s a story about a doctor that serves patients in rural Cambodia. Help from the local community would look different in Borey Peng Huoth, for example.


I think that's a huge stretch.

"Your community" isn't your doctor. This annecdote, to me, is cleariy an attempt to blame modernity for depression.


The story in the article that is being discussed here does not say that the doctor was explicitly not a member of the community that he served. You would have to just sort of make that part up and then come up with an explanation for how the doctor even knows that story if he wasn’t part of that community.

The doctor in the story exists in pretty recent history, which you would call modernity. If for some reason you’re using “modernity” as a way to say “systemic alienation of the individual” rather than “modernity” meaning “happening in the modern world” then yes, by your definition of that word, it is indeed a story about “modernity” being to blame for poor treatment for depression.


very interesting. would you be comfortable sharing what therapy uncovered as the cause for you?


Reading the FAQ it doesn't seem to bad. The Indie license allows you to run it simultaneously on 2 machines and the Studio license increases that to 4. You can transfer installations to new computers (or the same computer if doing a reinstall) up to 10 times per year, so you're not locked in to those 2 specific computers for eternity.

Restrictions are always annoying but I think they're striking a reasonable balance.


The upgrade license pretty spendy at $175.


People are working on this. std.zon is generally considered to be a good example of how to handle errors and diagnostics, though it's an area of active exploration. The plan is to eventually collect all the good patterns people have come up with and (1) publish them in a collection, and (2) update std to actually use them.


    > how to handle errors and diagnostics, though it's an area of active exploration
I am flabbergasted and exasperated by this sentiment. Zig is over 9 years old at this point. This feels this same kind of circular arguments from Golang "defenders" about generics and error handling.


Go gets a lot of flack for getting some things wrong but it was a stable and productive language within a couple of years.

If you look at the current Zig website the hello world example doesn’t compile because they changed the IO interface. Something as simple as writing to the console.

It’s easier to get things right if you have no issues breaking backward compatibility for a decade. It feels it’ll be well over 10 years before Zig is “1.0”.


+1


When will we see Zig 1.0?


Even if no one died in this incident, its novelty is what makes it so interesting.


GP said "depending on your personal preferences" and clearly didn't imply all "modern games" are competitive shooters.


Then depending on your personal preferences, all modern games are farming simulators.


They release on a fixed schedule of once per quarter: https://forgejo.org/docs/v13.0/admin/release-schedule/

These aren't semantic version numbers.


Rant incoming... This is the least intuitive and least useful versioning system as a user and sysadmin that I have seen in a long time. Calendar releases ought to follow calendar naming conventions (eg. 25.3 or 20251017 etc.) and non-semantic versioning should try to be obvious. From what I can tell: "multiples of 'four minus one' are LTS" is the numbering scheme (but the software is only good for a year so... why not just call it Forgejo v2025 for its March release?)

https://codeberg.org/forgejo/-/packages/container/forgejo/ve...

At the very least, a stable "LTS" tag would help.

The significance of Forgejo 13.0 is basically zero. A two-year cadence Debian release is newsworthy. Even if this were an LTS this is still not that interesting (unless there is some other context or significance that I'm not aware of).

Rant over.


If you go to their release page, you will see two versions listed. The current stable release (13.0) and the explicitlly marked LTS version (11), both with clearly visible end of support dates. Not sure how much simpler it can get :)


My annoyance was based on that page :D

But I've since learned that they are in fact using SemVer which means it was my expectations of what the project was trying to do that was mismatched. I didn't expect Major updates to mirror a quarterly cadence.


Their project, their rules. I don't know why you would think that your ideologies automatically translate into something that's convenient or better for them.


Fair - I don't know why they've chosen the current numbering so I looked it up:

https://forgejo.org/docs/v11.0/user/versions/

They use SemVer so there really are Major breaking changes every 3 months by their own definition.

I suppose my assumption was that the software was basically "feature complete" but they must be working hard to add more to it.


The Engadget article is just a shortened regurgitation of the original source: https://appleinsider.com/articles/25/09/29/fcc-mistakenly-le...


Actually this Reddit post predates that "original source" by several hours: https://old.reddit.com/r/apple/comments/1ntc1gt/the_fcc_has_...


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: