Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more amarshall's commentslogin

> the exposure feature in my iPhone camera…choose the "middle gray" point of the picture for the tone mapping process

No, it uses that to set the physical exposure via the shutter speed and ISO (iPhones have a fixed aperture, so that cannot be changed). It literally says this in the video you linked. This is not tone mapping. Tone mapping in a way may also happen afterwards to convert from the wider dynamic range of the sensor if the output format has a more limited dynamic range.


Even so folks are still maintaining it. Once a film is done, it’s done and no one looks back.


Except George ;)


Unfortunately page is completely blank (iOS Safari)



Blank for me too (Windows Firefox), ublock off.


Turn off your content blockers? Comes up fine for me. Or maybe add some? ;)


I have firefox and content blockers and it works fine for me. On Linux.

Maybe they simply banned some user agents commonly used by IA scrapers.


Btrfs and bcachefs both have data checksumming. I think ReFS does as well.


Yes, ZFS is not the only filesystem with data checksumming and guarantees, but it's one of the very rare exceptions that do.

ZFS has been in productions work loads since 2005, 20 years now. It's proven to be very safe.

BTRFS has known fundamental issues past one disk. It is however improving. I will say BTRFS is fine for a single drive. Even the developers last I checked(a few years ago) don't really recommend it past a single drive, though hopefully that's changing over time.

I'm not familiar enough with bcachefs to comment.


Even then you obviously need L2ARC as well!! /s


But on optane. Because obviously you need an all flash main array for streaming a movie.


It’s unfortunate some folks are missing the tongue-in-cheek nature of your comment.


> ZFS is notorious for corrupting itself when bit flips hit it and break the checksum on disk

ZFS does not need or benefit from ECC memory any more than any other FS. The bitflip corrupted the data, regardless of ZFS. Any other FS is just oblivious, ZFS will at least tell you your data is corrupt but happily keep operating.

> ZFS' RAM-hungry nature

ZFS is not really RAM-hungry, unless one uses deduplication (which is not enabled by default, nor generally recommended). It can often seem RAM hungry on Linux because the ARC is not counted as “cache” like the page cache is.

---

ZFS docs say as much as well: https://openzfs.github.io/openzfs-docs/Project%20and%20Commu...


And even dedup was finally rewritten to be significantly more memory efficient, as of the new 2.3 release of ZFS: https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/discussions/15896


> Yes, VSC is less "open source" than emacs. if "open sourceness" is a score out of 10 or something.

VS Code is not Open Source, period. What exists in the “Visual Studio Code - Open Source” repo that is MIT licensed but cannot be used to build VS Code. Once-upon-a-time it was just branding, telemetry, and a license to use the Microsoft Extension Marketplace. Now, however, there are proprietary, closed-source extensions and additions that are only available in the proprietary-licensed VS Code.

> You can always fetching the VSIX file and sideload it is if the "store" is down though.

No, you cannot do so legally (in the context of using Vscodium or similar), as it is a violation of [the VS Code Marketplace ToS][1]: “You may not import, install, or use Offerings published by Microsoft or GitHub, or Microsoft affiliates in any products or services except for the In-Scope Products and Services.”

[1]: https://cdn.vsassets.io/v/M253_20250303.9/_content/Microsoft...


violating a corporation's terms of service isn't unlawful. outside of that corporation, at least.


It is not criminal, but it is unlawful.


EULAs and TOS are not legal agreements. It is not unlawful to break them.

The TOS is purely a thing that the owner can point at as a legitimate reason for banning you.

There is no law anywhere binding you to the terms of an EULA or TOS. It's even less binding than a verbal agreement and a handshake.


Honestly incredible this level of misinformation is getting posted on HN: https://www.google.com/search?channel=fs&q=are+eula+legally+...


Caveat: this is not universal and depends on the juridiction.

For example in France a software/service editor can only really attack a user if he is infringing on copyrighted stuff. Outside of that the EULAs only allow it to ban/remove access to its services without risk of legal retaliation. And by infringing copyright I mean redistribution of copyrighted material, not downloading and using it. I am sure this is the case in many other countries.


This is again, wrong. EULA is just another word for "contract", and I'm not aware of any countries that have banned contracts.

Of course, specific EULAs may not be enforceable in some countries because they contain terms prohibited by law. But the concept of EULAs - a contract where you agree to certain terms in exchange for license to use software is enforceable in basically all countries.


IANAL, but the "A" is "agreement," which is only true if entered into. If I put a sentence at the top of my website that says "by loading this page you are agreeing to my terms of $1,000,000 per byte downloaded, payable by bitcoin" you are for sure not under any obligation that I can imagine because you didn't agree to my ~~terms~~ demand


A contract is only valid if you sign it, not because someone in his office unilateraly decided you have agreed.


One big difference is that apt and dnf are both binary package management systems, whereas Homebrew is a source-based build system with binary packages (“bottles”) added on top.


Nix effectively has per-user packages, but it’s hard to read into your full use case from your comment.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: