Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It makes the most sense when you're managing liquidity between multiple parties. I bet it would still be a logical next step if they couldn't get a PR boost off the hype.


If you have a group that has a trusted party (even if said party is one of the group, or a new group made from the group itself), that party can just run a bog-standard database and there's no need for a blockchain.


Of course, it’s an architecture decision. They do different things and different considerations may lead you to one or the other.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: